ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1 is maintained in the observability catalog as infrastructure observability with an explicit evidence and lifecycle record.
The current entry and its direct relationships are prominent; every other catalog technology and concept remains visible as muted background context.
22 directly connected nodes · 23 typed relationships · 199 muted catalog entries
List direct catalog relationships
- CatalogObservability Technology
- HierarchyScienceLogic MCP
- RelatedITSM
- Relatedcloud platforms
- Relatednetwork monitoring
- TelemetryMetrics
- TelemetryLogs
- TelemetryEvents
- ArchitectureHost Observability
- ArchitectureMicroservices Observability
- ArchitectureCloud Observability
- ArchitectureNetwork Observability
- ArchitectureOn-Premise Observability
- ArchitectureCI/CD Observability
- FunctionWorkflows
- FunctionAd-Hoc Functions
- FunctionService Discovery
- FunctionAlerting
- FunctionQuerying
- FunctionData Collection
- FunctionCorrelation
- FunctionAnomaly Detection
- RelatedScienceLogic MCP
Catalog position
ScienceLogic SL1 is maintained by ScienceLogic and classified as infrastructure observability in the enterprise platforms research cohort [1]. This establishes a stable catalog identity and a canonical starting source; it does not independently validate product outcomes, pricing, availability, or fit.
| Field | Catalog record |
|---|---|
| Entity type | Product |
| Signals | Metrics, Events, Logs |
| Deployment | Saas, Self Hosted, Hybrid |
| License model | commercial |
| Origin | United States |
Shared technology-map evidence
SL1 covers seven families across discovery, infrastructure monitoring, normalized operational data, service context, machine-learning insights, integrations, and automation [2]. The reviewed first-party pages did not publish list pricing or product-specific adoption counts; the $1,050 planning allowance and conservative breadth bubble are mixed-confidence.
Research stance
Treat this page as a maintainable evidence record, not an endorsement or direct ranking. Challenge the stance when the classification, evidence, or stated limits no longer match current primary evidence.
Technology-map evidence
How this tool is positioned
- Capability coverage
- 58% 7 of 12 families
- Reference cost
- $150per capability / month
- Market breadth
- 56/100 bounded evidence index
- Confidence
- documenteddocumented inputs
No public list price or product-specific adoption count was found; planning cost and vendor reach are mixed-confidence.
Axis sources: Hybrid Infrastructure Monitoring · ScienceLogic SL1 documentation
Source record
Bibliography
ScienceLogic, “ScienceLogic SL1 documentation.” [Online]. Available: https://docs.sciencelogic.com/. [Accessed: Aug. 12, 2026].
Canonical first-party or project documentation used for catalog identity and stated scope.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑ScienceLogic, ‘Hybrid Infrastructure Monitoring.’ [Online]. Available: https://sciencelogic.com/product/resources/making-hybrid-infrastructure-monitoring-work-for-you. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
Documents discovery monitoring normalized data machine learning service context integrations and automation.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑ScienceLogic, “ScienceLogic SL1 product website.” [Online]. Available: https://sciencelogic.com/product. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
Official price-list or product-site reference. Availability: contact-sales.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑ScienceLogic, “ScienceLogic official GitHub organization.” GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/ScienceLogic. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
Official solution/project GitHub reference. Scope: publisher-organization.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑
Known limits
Unresolved unknowns
- Current editions, pricing, availability, and independently measured outcomes require dated verification.
Public review
Discuss and correct
Comments are public. Proposed factual corrections must be incorporated into version-controlled research before they are treated as published.
Local preview does not have Giscus configured. Native comments and Giscus are never presented as competing primary systems on the same page.