OpenObserve
OpenObserve is maintained in the observability catalog as telemetry analysis platform with an explicit evidence and lifecycle record.
The current entry and its direct relationships are prominent; every other catalog technology and concept remains visible as muted background context.
24 directly connected nodes · 26 typed relationships · 194 muted catalog entries
List direct catalog relationships
- CatalogObservability Technology
- HierarchyOpenObserve Community MCP
- Hierarchyzctl
- RelatedOpenTelemetry
- RelatedPrometheus
- TelemetryMetrics
- TelemetryLogs
- TelemetryTraces
- TelemetryIncidents (AIOps)
- ArchitectureHost Observability
- ArchitectureMicroservices Observability
- ArchitectureCloud Observability
- ArchitectureData Warehouse Observability
- ArchitectureOn-Premise Observability
- ArchitectureLinux
- FunctionAd-Hoc Functions
- FunctionService Mapping
- FunctionArchitecture-Visualization
- FunctionAlerting
- FunctionDashboards
- FunctionQuerying
- FunctionLog Search
- FunctionMetrics Analysis
- FunctionIntegrations
- RelatedOpenObserve Community MCP
- Relatedzctl
Catalog position
OpenObserve is maintained by OpenObserve and classified as telemetry analysis platform in the independent and emerging research cohort [1]. This establishes a stable catalog identity and a canonical starting source; it does not independently validate product outcomes, pricing, availability, or fit.
| Field | Catalog record |
|---|---|
| Entity type | Open Source Project |
| Signals | Logs, Metrics, Traces |
| Deployment | Self Hosted, Saas |
| License model | open source and commercial cloud |
| Origin | United States |
Shared technology-map evidence
OpenObserve covers ten of twelve families across ingestion, logs, metrics, traces, pipelines, dashboards, alerts, RUM, error tracking, and LLM monitoring [1]. Published $0.50/GB ingestion and $0.01/GB query rates normalize to about $275 monthly for the shared workload [2]. The bubble reflects 21,000-plus stars and 1,000-plus forks when reviewed [3].
Research stance
Treat this page as a maintainable evidence record, not an endorsement or direct ranking. Challenge the stance when the classification, evidence, or stated limits no longer match current primary evidence.
Technology-map evidence
How this tool is positioned
- Capability coverage
- 83% 10 of 12 families
- Reference cost
- $28per capability / month
- Market breadth
- 82/100 bounded evidence index
- Confidence
- documenteddocumented inputs
Published ingestion and query rates normalized to the shared small-production workload.
Axis sources: OpenObserve documentation · OpenObserve Pricing · openobserve/openobserve
Source record
Bibliography
OpenObserve, “OpenObserve documentation.” [Online]. Available: https://openobserve.ai/docs/. [Accessed: Aug. 12, 2026].
Canonical first-party or project documentation used for catalog identity and stated scope.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑OpenObserve, ‘OpenObserve Pricing.’ [Online]. Available: https://openobserve.ai/pricing/. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
OpenObserve, ‘openobserve/openobserve.’ GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
Public repository stars forks and activity used as community-breadth signals.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑OpenObserve, “OpenObserve pricing.” [Online]. Available: https://openobserve.ai/pricing/. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
Official price-list or product-site reference. Availability: published.Canonical source ↗Return to article ↑OpenObserve, “Official GitHub repository.” GitHub. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/openobserve/openobserve. [Accessed: Aug. 14, 2026].
OpenObserve, “OpenObserve Terraform Provider.” Terraform Registry. [Online]. Available: https://registry.terraform.io/providers/openobserve/openobserve/latest. [Accessed: Aug. 20, 2026].
Known limits
Unresolved unknowns
- Current editions, pricing, availability, and independently measured outcomes require dated verification.
Public review
Discuss and correct
Comments are public. Proposed factual corrections must be incorporated into version-controlled research before they are treated as published.
Local preview does not have Giscus configured. Native comments and Giscus are never presented as competing primary systems on the same page.